{"id":5949,"date":"2025-10-04T18:38:37","date_gmt":"2025-10-04T16:38:37","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/tulipemedia.com\/?p=5949"},"modified":"2025-11-29T01:58:06","modified_gmt":"2025-11-29T00:58:06","slug":"ratio-liquidite-solvabilite","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/tulipemedia.com\/en\/ratio-liquidite-solvabilite\/","title":{"rendered":"Solvency and liquidity ratios in corporate finance"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>In this new course taken from the\u00a0<strong><a href=\"https:\/\/tulipemedia.com\/en\/cours-gestion-entreprise\/\">Complete Guide to Business Management<\/a><\/strong>, we will discover together the <strong>liquidity and solvency ratios<\/strong>, always with the aim of becoming <strong>knowledgeable in management and corporate finance<\/strong>, especially for beginners, managers and especially entrepreneurs who would like to create or develop their business without falling into management traps.<\/p>\n<p>First, let&#039;s quickly recall what we learned in the previous chapters about the <strong>functional assessment<\/strong>, then let&#039;s define together very simply what the <strong>liquidity<\/strong> and the <strong>solvency<\/strong> of a company, which are concepts relating to ratios which make it possible to evaluate the <strong>financial health<\/strong> of a company.<\/p>\n<h2>Reminder on the functional assessment<\/h2>\n<p>As a reminder, the <strong>functional balance sheet is a rereading of the classic accounting balance sheet<\/strong> in the form of <strong>balance sheet masses<\/strong> relevant from a financial point of view. The positions are reclassified according to their <strong>function<\/strong> in the <strong>operating cycle<\/strong> (investment, operation, financing), which makes it possible to produce a <strong>financial structure analysis<\/strong>, autonomy and balance of the company.<\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_5952\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-5952\" style=\"width: 1400px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-5952\" src=\"https:\/\/tulipemedia.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2025\/10\/Bilan-fonctionnel.png\" alt=\"Theoretical diagram of a functional assessment\" width=\"1400\" height=\"1300\" title=\"\"><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-5952\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Theoretical diagram of a functional assessment<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>In the functional assessment, we can identify the <strong>resources and long-term jobs on one side<\/strong>, and on the other the <strong>short-term resources<\/strong> (or current liabilities) as well as <strong>the company&#039;s relatively liquid assets<\/strong> (current assets).<\/p>\n<p>It is generally said that ideally, the <strong>long-term resources should be able to finance at least long-term jobs <\/strong>(this is the <a href=\"https:\/\/tulipemedia.com\/en\/fr-bfr-definition-exemples\/\">working capital<\/a>), which ensures the solvency of the company by guaranteeing that <strong>fixed assets<\/strong>, which are less liquid, <strong>are covered by stable funding<\/strong> (and not through current liabilities), thus reducing the risk of short-term insolvency.<\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_5933\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-5933\" style=\"width: 1600px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-5933\" src=\"https:\/\/tulipemedia.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2025\/08\/FR-Positif.png\" alt=\"Balance sheet with positive working capital: the FR covers the WCR and generates net cash\" width=\"1600\" height=\"1000\" title=\"\"><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-5933\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Balance sheet with positive working capital: the FR covers the WCR and generates net cash<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>We have seen all this in the previous chapters of this <a href=\"https:\/\/tulipemedia.com\/en\/cours-gestion-entreprise\/\">business management guide<\/a>This reminder of the functional balance sheet allows us to better understand the subtleties relating to solvency, because the measurement of the latter results from the balance between the different balance sheets.<\/p>\n<h2>Definition of the solvency ratio<\/h2>\n<p>Let us now move on to the definition of solvency, and solvency ratios. <strong>solvency<\/strong> actually measures the <strong>a company&#039;s ability to meet its debts as they fall due, whether short, medium or long term.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>It reflects the <strong>overall financial strength of the company<\/strong>, especially in the long term, <strong>unlike liquidity<\/strong>, which focuses on the <strong>ability<\/strong> to face the <strong>short-term commitments<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p>It&#039;s an approach <strong>heritage<\/strong> And <strong>theoretical<\/strong> : the company is not supposed to repay everything immediately, but we check whether, overall, it has \u201cassets\u201d greater than its debts.<\/p>\n<p>Financial institutions often use <strong>solvency ratios<\/strong> For <strong>assess capacity<\/strong> of a borrower to repay a loan before granting it. These ratios reflect both:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>the company&#039;s ability to <strong>cover all of its financial commitments with its assets<\/strong> (heritage approach),<\/li>\n<li>and its ability to <strong>sustainably finance its needs<\/strong> thanks to its stable resources, in particular its <strong>equity<\/strong> (structural approach).<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>In this chapter we will focus on the<strong>&#039;patrimonial approach to solvency&#039;<\/strong>, which compares the <strong>company assets and liabilities<\/strong>The structural approach, based on the balance between stable resources and stable jobs, has already been discussed in the chapter on <a href=\"https:\/\/tulipemedia.com\/en\/fr-bfr-definition-exemples\/\">Working capital and working capital requirement<\/a>, as well as in the chapter on <a href=\"https:\/\/tulipemedia.com\/en\/ratio-dendettement-autonomie-financiere\/\">debt ratios<\/a>.<\/p>\n<h2>Main solvency ratios<\/h2>\n<p>There are several accounting ratios that can be used to assess a company&#039;s solvency. These include:<strong> financial autonomy ratios<\/strong>, already discussed in <a href=\"https:\/\/tulipemedia.com\/en\/ratio-dendettement-autonomie-financiere\/\">the previous chapter<\/a>, such as:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><strong>Debt ratio = Net financial debt \/ Equity<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>This ratio measures the <strong>dependence of the company on its creditors<\/strong>. THE <strong>net financial debts<\/strong> generally correspond to the <strong>borrowings and financial liabilities less cash and liquid assets<\/strong>A high ratio indicates high debt.<\/p>\n<p>Next, we have the financial autonomy ratio, also discussed in <a href=\"https:\/\/tulipemedia.com\/en\/ratio-dendettement-autonomie-financiere\/\">the previous chapter on debt<\/a> :<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><strong>Financial autonomy ratio = Equity \/ Permanent capital<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>THE <strong>permanent capital<\/strong> include as a reminder <strong>equity and long-term debt<\/strong>I am putting here a second time the diagram on the balance sheet with FR and BFR in order to visualize the balance sheet masses and thus better understand the ratios discussed.<\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_5933\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-5933\" style=\"width: 1600px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-5933\" src=\"https:\/\/tulipemedia.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2025\/08\/FR-Positif.png\" alt=\"Balance sheet with positive working capital: the FR covers the WCR and generates net cash\" width=\"1600\" height=\"1000\" title=\"\"><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-5933\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Balance sheet with positive working capital: the FR covers the WCR and generates net cash<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>This ratio assesses the <strong>share of equity in the stable financing of the company<\/strong>. A <strong>high ratio indicates good financial autonomy<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p>In addition to these ratios, we finally have a new ratio that we discover here which is the <strong>general solvency ratio<\/strong>. He is a <strong>key indicator<\/strong> and its formula is as follows:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><strong>General solvency ratio = Total assets \/ Current liabilities<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>THE <strong>current liabilities<\/strong> corresponds to <strong>everything the company owes to Liabilities<\/strong>, therefore financial debts, supplier debts, tax debts, etc.<\/p>\n<p>This ratio measures the <strong>ability of the company&#039;s total assets to cover all debts<\/strong> (short, medium and long term):<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>A ratio greater than 1 indicates that the company has sufficient assets to cover all of its debts, which is a sign of solvency.<\/li>\n<li>A ratio below 1, although rare, can occur in the case of negative equity, for example after several years of losses.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Be careful, when we say that &quot;assets cover debts&quot;, we should not see this as a financing link: in reality, <strong>it is the debts and the equity (the liabilities) which finance the assets<\/strong>. Except that here, we reason more in terms of guarantee value: <strong>Would the assets owned by the company be sufficient to repay what it owes?<\/strong><\/p>\n<h3>Example of a positive solvency ratio<\/h3>\n<p>If a company has total assets of \u20ac1,000,000 and current liabilities of \u20ac600,000, its current ratio is 1.67, which reflects good solvency.<\/p>\n<h3>Example of a negative solvency ratio<\/h3>\n<p>Balance sheet of a company with negative equity:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Total assets: \u20ac800,000 (fixed assets + cash + receivables)<\/li>\n<li>Current liabilities: \u20ac900,000 (loans + supplier debts)<\/li>\n<li>Equity: -\u20ac100,000 (cumulative losses exceeded capital and reserves resulting in a negative value in liabilities).<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>In this example, the balance sheet is balanced, with \u20ac800,000 on each side. Except that if we calculate the general solvency ratio, we have:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\">General solvency ratio = Total assets \/ Current liabilities = \u20ac800,000 \/ \u20ac900,000 = 0.89<\/p>\n<p>The ratio is therefore logically less than 1: the company does not have enough assets to cover its debts and the ratio reflects a situation of potential insolvency.<\/p>\n<p>Another specific ratio is sometimes used:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><strong>Financial debt coverage ratio = Total assets \/ Financial debt<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>This ratio assesses the ability of assets to cover financial debts (bank loans, bonds, etc.). This therefore concerns financial debts and not debts related to operations, such as supplier debts, for example.<\/p>\n<p>A ratio greater than 1 means that assets exceed financial liabilities, strengthening solvency.<\/p>\n<p>However, this ratio does not take into account the liquidity of assets, which can limit the actual repayment capacity (which will bring us to the upcoming section on liquidity, i.e. the ability to raise money from short-term assets).<\/p>\n<h2>Interpretation of the general solvency ratio<\/h2>\n<p>In summary, if the general solvency ratio (or financial debt coverage) is greater than 1, this can be interpreted as a positive indicator, because it shows that <strong>the company can theoretically repay its debts by mobilizing its assets<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p>However, a thorough analysis must include other factors, such as the liquidity of assets and the company&#039;s ability to <strong>generate cash flow<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p>A ratio below 1, for example in the case of negative equity due to cumulative losses, signals a risk of insolvency.<\/p>\n<h2>Definition of the liquidity ratio<\/h2>\n<p>THE<strong> liquidity ratios<\/strong> measure the <strong>ability<\/strong> from one company to another <strong>honor its short-term financial commitments<\/strong> (less than one year), such as supplier debts, salaries, or VAT.<\/p>\n<p>There <strong>liquidity<\/strong> represents the <strong>cash availability<\/strong> Or <strong>assets quickly convertible into cash<\/strong> (such as short-term trade receivables or negotiable investments) for <strong>cover current liabilities<\/strong> (short-term debts).<\/p>\n<p>Here is the balance sheet diagram with FR and WCR for the third time in order to always keep in mind the articulation of balance sheet masses and thus fully understand the principles of liquid assets (represented in the diagram by stocks, customer receivables and cash) and current liabilities (represented by short-term debts, generally supplier debts but this can also include tax and social security debts, VAT, etc.).<\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_5933\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-5933\" style=\"width: 1600px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-5933\" src=\"https:\/\/tulipemedia.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2025\/08\/FR-Positif.png\" alt=\"Balance sheet with positive working capital: the FR covers the WCR and generates net cash\" width=\"1600\" height=\"1000\" title=\"\"><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-5933\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Balance sheet with positive working capital: the FR covers the WCR and generates net cash<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>Without sufficient liquidity, a company, even if solvent in the long term, risks defaulting on payments in the short term. For example, a company with many fixed assets but little cash may be solvent (able to cover its total long-term debts) but lack the liquidity to pay its suppliers in the short term.<\/p>\n<p>Here, unlike the notion of solvency, we are in a more concrete and operational logic: can the company pay its invoices in the coming days or months?<\/p>\n<h2>The different liquidity ratios<\/h2>\n<p>There are several liquidity ratios, which will measure the liquidity of a company in the more or less long term.<\/p>\n<h3>Current ratio<\/h3>\n<p>The current ratio includes <strong>all liquidity<\/strong> and allows to measure the <strong>a company&#039;s ability to cover its short-term debts (current liabilities) with all of its current assets<\/strong>To obtain it, it is therefore sufficient to divide the current assets by the current liabilities:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><strong>Current ratio = Current assets \/ Current liabilities<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The interpretation of this general liquidity ratio is quite simple:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>A ratio greater than 1 means that the company has more current assets than current liabilities, which is a sign of good short-term financial health;<\/li>\n<li>If it is below 1, the liquidity ratio raises fears of difficulties in covering short-term obligations with current assets;<\/li>\n<li>If it is greater than 2, the ratio may suggest an excessive accumulation of cash or unused current assets, which could be invested more productively, according to the company&#039;s strategy.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>The target value for this ratio depends on the industry. For example, construction or real estate companies, which hold large inventories, often need a high ratio (&gt; 1.5) to ensure their liquidity. They therefore have little short-term debt compared to their inventories and receivables. On the other hand, consulting firms, with rapid collection cycles, can operate with a lower ratio (for example, 0.8), because they have little inventory, few receivables (since clients pay quickly), and short-term debt that is sometimes higher than current assets.<\/p>\n<h3>Restricted or reduced liquidity ratio<\/h3>\n<p>THE <strong>tight liquidity ratio<\/strong>, also called the tight liquidity ratio, is a financial indicator that measures the <strong>a company&#039;s ability to repay its short-term debts without having to sell its inventory<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p>To calculate it, it is therefore sufficient to remove the value of the stocks from the current assets, before dividing by the liabilities:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><strong>Tight Liquidity Ratio = (Current Assets \u2013 Inventories) \/ Current Liabilities<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The purpose of this ratio is to measure the company&#039;s ability to repay its short-term debts through its cash, without having to sell its inventory.<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>A tight liquidity ratio close to 1 or higher indicates that the company can cover its short-term liabilities with its cash and receivables, without relying on inventory.<\/li>\n<li><strong>A ratio less than 1<\/strong> suggests a <strong>dependence on stock flow<\/strong> For <strong>repay short-term debts<\/strong>, which can be problematic if inventory is slow to sell. Indeed, since we have isolated inventory from the calculation, and the company cannot cover its short-term liabilities with its accounts receivable and cash, it needs to add its inventory back into the calculation (by valuing it as a liquid asset) in order to increase its liquidity ratio.<\/li>\n<li>The acceptable value depends on the sector: in large-scale distribution, where stocks sell quickly, a ratio &lt; 1 can be tolerated, because stocks sell fairly quickly, customers pay cash and suppliers are paid in installments.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>The tight liquidity ratio is therefore stricter than the current ratio, as it excludes inventories. This is because inventories can take time to convert into cash depending on the business sector, so this ratio can be relevant to assess a company&#039;s liquidity level independently of its inventories.<\/p>\n<h3>Quick liquidity ratio<\/h3>\n<p>Finally, we have the immediate liquidity ratio, which is the strictest of the liquidity ratios. This will measure the company&#039;s ability to cover its current liabilities with only its cash and short-term investments.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><strong>Quick Liquidity Ratio = Cash + Short-Term Investments \/ Current Liabilities<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>By focusing only on directly actionable cash, this ratio makes it possible to identify debts that can be settled without waiting for the collection of customer receivables or the disposal of stocks.<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>If this ratio is greater than 1, it will obviously be a sign of good financial health because it will mean that the company can pay its short-term debts without waiting for the recovery of receivables or the sale of stocks.<\/li>\n<li>A ratio below 1 is common, especially in industries where cash collections are rapid (such as retail, where customers pay cash). The minimum acceptable value varies depending on the industry and the company&#039;s cash collection cycle.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>In general, the shorter the collection cycle (i.e. low customer receivables and, for what interests us here, relatively low available cash), the more a low ratio is considered acceptable (as in the distribution trade, for example).<\/p>\n<p>This can be explained by the fact that the company collects money from its customers very quickly (short collection cycle), and therefore does not need to store a lot of cash since the money is constantly coming in.<\/p>\n<p>Conversely, a company that has to wait 90 days to be paid should keep more cash on hand to cover its short-term liabilities, so a higher quick ratio is generally expected.<\/p>\n<h2>Interest in liquidity ratios<\/h2>\n<p>Liquidity ratios are essential tools for assessing the <strong>short-term financial health of a company<\/strong>Their target value depends on the sector, the activity, and the strategic objectives of the company.<\/p>\n<p>These ratios are used to:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Anticipate cash flow difficulties: A ratio that is too low (for example, a current ratio &lt; 1) signals a <strong>risk of cash flow tension<\/strong>, making the company vulnerable to unforeseen events.<\/li>\n<li>Building stakeholder confidence: <strong>Healthy ratios facilitate access to financing<\/strong> (bank loans, investor confidence) by demonstrating good liquidity management.<\/li>\n<li>Optimize resource allocation: <strong>An excessively high ratio may indicate underutilization of cash<\/strong>, which could be reinvested (for example, in development projects).<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>In combination with solvency ratios, liquidity ratios provide a comprehensive view of the company&#039;s financial health, enabling managers to manage effectively and anticipate risks.<\/p>\n<h2>Difference between solvency and liquidity<\/h2>\n<p>As we have seen, the <strong>fundamental difference<\/strong> between the <strong>liquidity<\/strong> and the <strong>solvency<\/strong> resides in the <strong>period<\/strong> taken into account :<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>There <strong>liquidity<\/strong> measure the <strong>ability<\/strong> of a company to honor its commitments to <strong>short term<\/strong> (less than a year), thanks to its <strong>current assets<\/strong> (cash, accounts receivable, etc.)<\/li>\n<li>There <strong>solvency<\/strong>, on the other hand, evaluates the <strong>ability<\/strong> to cover all of its debts <strong>long term<\/strong>, based on <strong>all its assets<\/strong> And <strong>its financial structure<\/strong>.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Concretely, a company can <strong>lack immediate cash<\/strong> (i.e. having little cash or assets easily convertible into cash) while remaining solvent, i.e. <strong>able to cover its long-term debts<\/strong> thanks to <strong>long-term assets (fixed assets) and stable resources<\/strong> (equity and long-term borrowing). For example, a company with a valuable building but little cash may be solvent, but lack the liquidity to pay its suppliers in the short term.<\/p>\n<p>There <strong>solvency<\/strong> in the long term is based on a balanced financial structure, where long-term resources (equity and long-term debt) finance at least long-term jobs (fixed assets), with a positive overall net working capital (which makes it possible to finance part of the current assets).<\/p>\n<p>This ensures that <strong>illiquid assets<\/strong>, like fixed assets, are <strong>financed by stable resources<\/strong>, <strong>reducing the risk of insolvency<\/strong>If fixed assets exceeded long-term resources, the company would have to resort to short-term debt, which would weaken its solvency by increasing the risk of cash flow difficulties.<\/p>\n<h2>Example of calculation and analysis of a company&#039;s solvency<\/h2>\n<p>A company has:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Fixed assets (long-term jobs): \u20ac400,000<\/li>\n<li>Current assets (short-term uses): \u20ac200,000<\/li>\n<li>Equity: \u20ac300,000<\/li>\n<li>Long-term debt: \u20ac200,000<\/li>\n<li>Short-term debts: \u20ac100,000<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>In order to analyze the solvency of this company, let us first calculate its overall net working capital:<\/p>\n<p>Total net working capital (TNWC) = Long-term resources \u2013 Long-term uses = (\u20ac300,000 + \u20ac200,000) \u2013 \u20ac400,000 = \u20ac100,000.<\/p>\n<p>The FRNG is positive, which is a good sign. Now let&#039;s calculate the general solvency ratio to get a better idea of the financial health of this company:<\/p>\n<p>General solvency ratio = Total assets \/ Current liabilities = (\u20ac400,000 + \u20ac200,000) \/ (\u20ac200,000 + \u20ac100,000) = \u20ac600,000 \/ \u20ac300,000 = 2.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Interpretation:<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Long-term resources (\u20ac500,000) largely cover fixed assets (\u20ac400,000), which indicates a balanced financial structure.<\/li>\n<li>The positive FRNG (\u20ac100,000) shows that the company can finance part of its current assets with stable resources, strengthening its solvency.<\/li>\n<li>If fixed assets were \u20ac600,000 (higher than long-term resources of \u20ac500,000), the FRNG would be negative (-\u20ac100,000), forcing the company to finance its fixed assets with short-term debts, which would weaken its solvency.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h2>Conclusion<\/h2>\n<p>In summary, the <strong>solvency and liquidity ratios<\/strong> are complementary to assess the <strong>financial health of a company<\/strong>Solvency reflects the company&#039;s ability to meet all of its debts over the long term, while liquidity focuses on its immediate ability to meet its short-term deadlines.<\/p>\n<p>A good balance between the two is essential: a company can be solvent but lack liquidity, and conversely have cash without guaranteeing its financial solidity over time. This is why it is important to interpret these ratios not in isolation, but <strong>as a whole and taking into account the sector of activity<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p>In the next chapters, we will delve deeper into financial analysis with other key indicators, in order to consolidate this global vision essential for effectively managing a business!<\/p>\n<h2>Corrected exercises on solvency and liquidity<\/h2>\n<h3>Exercise 1<\/h3>\n<p>A company presents the following data:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Total assets: \u20ac1,500,000<\/li>\n<li>Debts due: \u20ac900,000<\/li>\n<li>Available cash: \u20ac100,000<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>1\/ Calculate the general solvency ratio.<br \/>\n2\/ Interpret the result.<br \/>\n3\/ Calculate the immediate liquidity ratio (cash \/ payable debts).<br \/>\n4\/ Comment on the company&#039;s liquidity.<\/p>\n<p><label>1\/ Your answer (solvency):<br \/>\n<input type=\"text\" placeholder=\"...\" \/><br \/>\n<\/label><\/p>\n<p><label>2\/ Your answer (interpretation):<br \/>\n<textarea cols=\"50\" rows=\"4\" placeholder=\"Explain your reasoning...\"><\/textarea><br \/>\n<\/label><\/p>\n<p><label>3\/ Your answer (liquidity):<br \/>\n<input type=\"text\" placeholder=\"...\" \/><br \/>\n<\/label><\/p>\n<p><label>4\/ Your answer (comment):<br \/>\n<textarea cols=\"50\" rows=\"4\" placeholder=\"Explain your reasoning...\"><\/textarea><br \/>\n<\/label><\/p>\n<p style=\"color: green; margin-top: 10px;\"><b>Correction:<\/b><\/p>\n<p style=\"color: green;\">1\/ Solvency ratio = 1,500,000 \/ 900,000 = <b>1,67<\/b><\/p>\n<p style=\"color: green;\">2\/ Interpretation: a ratio &gt; 1 indicates that the company has sufficient assets to cover all of its debts. It is generally solvent.<\/p>\n<p style=\"color: green;\">3\/ Immediate liquidity ratio = 100,000 \/ 900,000 = <b>0,11<\/b><\/p>\n<p style=\"color: green;\">4\/ Comment: immediate liquidity is low, the company could encounter difficulties in repaying its due debts with its available cash alone.<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<h3>Exercise 2 \u2013 Analysis of the level of debt and financial structure<\/h3>\n<p>A company presents the following data:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Equity: \u20ac800,000<\/li>\n<li>Long-term financial debts: \u20ac1,000,000<\/li>\n<li>Short-term debts (suppliers, tax and social security debts): \u20ac200,000<\/li>\n<li>Available cash: \u20ac200,000<\/li>\n<li>Total assets: \u20ac2,000,000<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><strong>Questions :<\/strong><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>Calculate net financial debts.<\/li>\n<li>Calculate the debt ratio.<\/li>\n<li>Interpret this ratio in a few lines.<\/li>\n<li>Calculate the portion of the asset financed by the <strong>stable resources<\/strong>.<\/li>\n<li>Calculate the portion of the asset financed by the <strong>equity only<\/strong>.<\/li>\n<li>Interpret these last two ratios and draw a general conclusion about the financial structure of the company.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><label>1\/ Your answer (net financial debts):<br \/>\n<input type=\"text\" placeholder=\"...\" \/><br \/>\n<\/label><\/p>\n<p><label>2\/ Your answer (debt ratio):<br \/>\n<input type=\"text\" placeholder=\"... %\" \/><br \/>\n<\/label><\/p>\n<p><label>3\/ Your answer (interpretation of the debt ratio):<br \/>\n<textarea cols=\"50\" rows=\"4\" placeholder=\"Explain your reasoning...\"><\/textarea><br \/>\n<\/label><\/p>\n<p><label>4\/ Your answer (portion of assets financed by stable resources):<br \/>\n<input type=\"text\" placeholder=\"... %\" \/><br \/>\n<\/label><\/p>\n<p><label>5\/ Your answer (portion of assets financed by equity):<br \/>\n<input type=\"text\" placeholder=\"... %\" \/><br \/>\n<\/label><\/p>\n<p><label>6\/ Your answer (interpretation and overall conclusion):<br \/>\n<textarea cols=\"50\" rows=\"6\" placeholder=\"Analyze the financial structure and conclude on the company&#039;s solidity...\"><\/textarea><br \/>\n<\/label><\/p>\n<p style=\"color: green; margin-top: 10px;\"><b>Correction:<\/b><\/p>\n<p style=\"color: green; margin-top: 6px;\"><strong>1\/ Calculation of net financial debts:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"color: green; margin-left: 12px;\">Net financial debts = Long-term financial debts \u2013 Cash = \u20ac1,000,000 \u2013 \u20ac200,000 = <b>800 000 \u20ac<\/b><\/p>\n<p style=\"color: green; margin-top: 6px;\"><strong>2\/ Calculation of the debt ratio:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"color: green; margin-left: 12px;\">Debt ratio = 800,000 \/ 800,000 = <b>1.0 \u2192 100 %<\/b><\/p>\n<p style=\"color: green; margin-top: 6px;\"><strong>3\/ Interpretation of the ratio:<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul style=\"color: green;\">\n<li>A debt ratio of 100 % means that net financial debts are equivalent to equity.<\/li>\n<li>The company therefore has a balanced structure between its own and borrowed financing.<\/li>\n<li>The situation is acceptable if the economic profitability remains higher than the cost of debt, but the room for maneuver for new debt remains limited.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p style=\"color: green; margin-top: 6px;\"><strong>4\/ Calculation of the share of assets financed by stable resources:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"color: green; margin-left: 12px;\">Stable resources = Equity + Financial debts LT = 800,000 + 1,000,000 = <b>1 800 000 \u20ac<\/b><br \/>\nShare of assets financed by stable resources = 1,800,000 \/ 2,000,000 = <b>0.9 \u2192 90 %<\/b><\/p>\n<p style=\"color: green; margin-top: 6px;\"><strong>5\/ Calculation of the portion of assets financed by equity alone:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"color: green; margin-left: 12px;\">Equity \/ Total assets = 800,000 \/ 2,000,000 = <b>0.4 \u2192 40 %<\/b><\/p>\n<p style=\"color: green; margin-top: 6px;\"><strong>6\/ Interpretation:<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul style=\"color: green;\">\n<li><strong>Stable Resources \/ Assets = 90 %:<\/strong> Almost all assets are financed by sustainable resources. The company is therefore only marginally dependent on short-term - healthy financial structure.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Equity \/ Assets = 40 %:<\/strong> financial autonomy is correct, but the company remains significantly financed by long-term debt.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Overall reading:<\/strong> resources are stable (good long-term solvency), but the share of equity remains moderate. The company must ensure that it maintains a sufficient level of profitability to secure its repayment capacity.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p style=\"background-color: #f8f8f8; padding: 10px; border-left: 4px solid #339966; color: #333; margin-top: 10px;\">\ud83d\udca1 <strong>Educational note:<\/strong><br \/>\nThis exercise combines two complementary approaches:<br \/>\n- THE <em>debt ratio<\/em> measures the company&#039;s dependence on external financing.<br \/>\n- THE <em>structural ratios<\/em> (stable resources \/ assets and equity \/ assets) measure the strength and autonomy of overall financing.<br \/>\nTogether, they allow us to appreciate the <strong>long-term solvency<\/strong> and the <strong>financial structure<\/strong> of the company.<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<h3>Exercise 3<\/h3>\n<p>A company presents the following data:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Current assets: \u20ac500,000<\/li>\n<li>Short-term debts: \u20ac400,000<\/li>\n<li>Cash: \u20ac80,000<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>1\/ Calculate the general liquidity ratio.<br \/>\n2\/ Calculate the immediate liquidity ratio.<br \/>\n3\/ Comment on the results in terms of the company&#039;s ability to meet its short-term debts.<\/p>\n<p><label>1\/ Your answer (general liquidity):<br \/>\n<input type=\"text\" placeholder=\"...\" \/><br \/>\n<\/label><\/p>\n<p><label>2\/ Your answer (immediate liquidity):<br \/>\n<input type=\"text\" placeholder=\"...\" \/><br \/>\n<\/label><\/p>\n<p><label>3\/ Your answer (comment):<br \/>\n<textarea cols=\"50\" rows=\"4\" placeholder=\"Explain your reasoning...\"><\/textarea><br \/>\n<\/label><\/p>\n<p style=\"color: green; margin-top: 10px;\"><b>Correction:<\/b><\/p>\n<p style=\"color: green;\">1\/ Current ratio = 500,000 \/ 400,000 = <b>1,25<\/b><\/p>\n<p style=\"color: green;\">2\/ Immediate liquidity ratio = 80,000 \/ 400,000 = <b>0,2<\/b><\/p>\n<p style=\"color: green;\">3\/ Comment: General liquidity is adequate; the company can cover its short-term debts with its current assets. Immediate liquidity is low, meaning that in the event of immediate repayment, cash alone would be insufficient.<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<h3>Exercise 4<\/h3>\n<p>A company has the following data:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Total assets: \u20ac1,200,000<\/li>\n<li>Debts due: \u20ac1,500,000<\/li>\n<li>Cash: \u20ac200,000<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>1\/ Calculate the general solvency ratio.<br \/>\n2\/ Interpret the result.<br \/>\n3\/ Analyze the company&#039;s ability to immediately meet its debts with available cash.<\/p>\n<p><label>1\/ Your answer (solvency):<br \/>\n<input type=\"text\" placeholder=\"...\" \/><br \/>\n<\/label><\/p>\n<p><label>2\/ Your answer (interpretation):<br \/>\n<textarea cols=\"50\" rows=\"4\" placeholder=\"Explain your reasoning...\"><\/textarea><br \/>\n<\/label><\/p>\n<p><label>3\/ Your answer (cash flow analysis):<br \/>\n<textarea cols=\"50\" rows=\"4\" placeholder=\"Explain your reasoning...\"><\/textarea><br \/>\n<\/label><\/p>\n<p style=\"color: green; margin-top: 10px;\"><b>Correction:<\/b><\/p>\n<p style=\"color: green;\">1\/ Solvency ratio = 1,200,000 \/ 1,500,000 = <b>0,8<\/b><\/p>\n<p style=\"color: green;\">2\/ Interpretation: ratio &lt; 1 indicates that total assets are lower than payable debts. The company is theoretically insolvent at this level.<\/p>\n<p style=\"color: green;\">3\/ Cash flow analysis: the cash flow of \u20ac200,000 only covers part of the debts (200,000 \/ 1,500,000 = 13.3 %). The company cannot therefore immediately meet all of its debts.<\/p>\n<p>\ud83d\udc49 Next chapter: <a href=\"https:\/\/tulipemedia.com\/en\/cours-rentabilite-financiere-economique\/\">Complete course on profitability ratios (ROE, ROA, ROCE, ROIC, ROS and DuPont)<\/a><br \/>\n\ud83d\udcd6 <a href=\"https:\/\/tulipemedia.com\/en\/cours-gestion-entreprise\/\">Back to Table of Contents<\/a><\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Dans ce nouveau cours tir\u00e9 du\u00a0Guide complet sur la gestion d&rsquo;entreprise, nous allons d\u00e9couvrir ensemble les ratios de liquidit\u00e9 et de solvabilit\u00e9, toujours dans l&rsquo;optique de devenir incollable en gestion et en finance d&rsquo;entreprise, surtout pour les d\u00e9butants, managers et surtout les entrepreneurs qui souhaiteraient cr\u00e9er ou d\u00e9velopper leur entreprise sans tomber dans les pi\u00e8ges [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":17,"featured_media":5974,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[20],"tags":[171],"class_list":["post-5949","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-finance","tag-fondamentaux-de-la-gestion-dentreprise"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/tulipemedia.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5949","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/tulipemedia.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/tulipemedia.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tulipemedia.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/17"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tulipemedia.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5949"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/tulipemedia.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5949\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":6181,"href":"https:\/\/tulipemedia.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5949\/revisions\/6181"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tulipemedia.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/5974"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/tulipemedia.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5949"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tulipemedia.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5949"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tulipemedia.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5949"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}